The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has directed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attorneys to prioritize removal proceedings against non-citizens suspected of illegally voting in U.S. elections, expanding how existing immigration statutes tied to election-related violations are enforced.
Officials say the change is intended to ensure more uniform application of federal immigration law in cases involving unlawful participation in the electoral process.
Under guidance issued by DHS General Counsel James Percival, ICE attorneys are instructed to initiate administrative removal proceedings in cases involving alleged illegal voting or false claims of U.S. citizenship when supporting evidence is available.
The directive allows immigration cases to move forward without a criminal conviction, relying instead on administrative records such as voter registration files, state election data, and related documentation collected through federal review processes.
The legal basis for the policy rests on provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which classify unlawful voting and false claims of citizenship as deportable offenses.
Under DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s leadership, the department has continued rolling out new enforcement directives aimed at strengthening immigration law application, including the latest guidance directing ICE attorneys to prioritize illegal voting-related cases.
DHS officials say these statutes apply regardless of whether an individual has been convicted in criminal court, allowing immigration authorities to pursue removal based on evidentiary findings in administrative proceedings rather than criminal prosecution.
Officials described the directive as part of an effort to strengthen enforcement consistency in cases involving election-related violations.
DHS General Counsel James Percival said the policy reflects the administration’s position that violations of voting law by non-citizens undermine confidence in electoral systems and should carry immigration consequences when substantiated by available evidence.
He cited President Donald Trump in emphasizing that safeguarding election processes includes ensuring that participation is limited to eligible voters under federal law.
The directive is being implemented in coordination with Executive Order 14248, signed by Trump on March 25.
The order instructs federal agencies to expand verification of voter eligibility, improve coordination between immigration and election-related databases, and strengthen enforcement of statutes related to non-citizen voting.
It also calls for broader interagency cooperation to identify and investigate potential violations more efficiently.
Under the new framework, ICE’s Office of the Principal Legal Advisor will work with immigration judges to process cases involving credible evidence of illegal voting through expedited removal proceedings where appropriate.
Officials say the goal is to reduce procedural delays by allowing cases supported by documentation to proceed more quickly through the immigration system once identified, The Epoch Times reported.
Supporters of the policy argue that it strengthens deterrence by ensuring that violations tied to voting eligibility result in clear immigration consequences.
They contend that even limited instances of non-citizen voting can affect confidence in election systems and justify more proactive federal enforcement when evidence is available.
Critics, including immigration advocates, caution that the reliance on administrative evidence rather than criminal convictions could broaden the scope of enforcement and increase the number of individuals subject to removal proceedings.
They also warn that immigration courts, already facing significant backlogs, may experience additional strain if case volumes rise under the new directive, according to The Kenya Times.
Federal law has long prohibited non-citizens from voting in federal elections, and most states maintain similar restrictions for state and local races.
However, enforcement has historically been uneven, often depending on isolated investigations or referrals rather than systematic immigration consequences tied directly to voting-related violations.
DHS maintains that the updated guidance is intended to standardize enforcement practices across jurisdictions and ensure that immigration violations involving unlawful voting are treated as a consistent enforcement priority when supported by available evidence.
Officials say the policy applies broadly across immigration categories, including individuals with expired visas, pending asylum claims, or unlawful status, focusing on enforcement of existing law rather than creating new legal standards.
WATCH:
