BY THE NUMBERS: Just How Far Left-Of-Center Are Kamala’s Politics… REALLY?

Brian Mudd discovered some interesting facts about Kamala that her Media Masseurs would never share… and they shine some helpful light on who exactly the ‘real’ Kamala really is.

With Biden suddenly dropping out of the race with a blade in his back with a suspicious ‘B.O.’ monograph on it, pundits are saying that Biden returned the favor by throwing his support behind Kamala rather than some kind of a lightning primary.

If that portrayal is accurate, any report of a groundswell of unity behind Kamala is every bit as authentically natural as Joe Biden’s hair or Hunter’s teeth. Komrade Kaos is the only candidate they’ve got, so they’re all forced together to ‘grin and bear it’.

Since she’s heir apparent, it’s media’s job to breathe life into her campaign. It’s no small job, either, considering how many times they’ve ALREADY tried to re-boot her image again and again during Biden’s time in office.

Now they’re straight-up memory-holing her past policy positions while she pledges to take more moderate ones than the ones she’s espoused in her own words again and again and again.

Is this a ‘tack to the right’ or is it a head-fake like the one Joe Biden gave us when he ran as a ‘moderate’ so that he could overtake Bernie and seem like a less crazy Dem choice than the guy who once lived in an honest-to-goodness commie kibbutz… with Stalinist sympathies right up until the totalitarian’s death.

The joke was on the American voter when we learned — too late — that Biden became a Trojan horse for political agendas so far to the left that even Bernie dared not run on them.

Some of her fall-off-the-left edge of the map positions like defunding the police, stating that illegal aliens are not criminals, putting an end to fracking, or doing away with all private health insurance… all of which she has said with her own mouth… are reportedly NOT part of the platform on which she’s running.

In her POTUS run, she’s shifting to the middle, you see. Nothing suspicious to see here.

Forget the fact that Barack Obama assured us he supported the traditional definition of marriage — until he was securely sworn into his second term, or how the Senate unanimously voted against AOC’s Green New Deal… until they slapped a new name on it in the Biden years, pretending it was an ‘Inflation Reduction Act’.

Only after it passed, to the fanfare of an adoring media, did elected Democrats admit the bait and switch… that this legislation *really* prioritized the environment rather than the economy. This explains why the economy went all the way up to 9% inflation with the cynically named ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ in effect.

Even methods we could have once used to objectively track how ‘extreme’ or ‘moderate’ she really is have been made more difficult to use — for example, the non-partisan GovTrack rating was (conveniently) taken down immediately after she became the presumptive Dem nominee.

Brian Mudd, while he was hosting the Mark Levin Show on Tuesday night. His catchphrase is that ‘there are two sides to every story and one side to facts’.

Brian found a way to get past the political posturing to see what positions she cared enough about to put her money where her mouth was. He found an interesting way to measure the voting record to contrast it against an ‘ordinary’ Democrat Senator.

At one hour and 33 minutes into the July 30th episode, (to credit the source) he showed us all how to put the lie to media claims she’s a ‘moderate’… using ironclad numbers. Bold text that follows is transcribed from the show:

“We have one of the most interesting comparisons you could possibly have in a presidential election. Harris spent four years in the United States Senate that corresponded precisely with the four years of Trump’s presidency. So what we have the ability to do, is actually compare THIER exact voting records… Trump’s and Harris’s. 

And during the Trump administration, during his four years in office, you had 120 Senators that ended up casting votes. Of them, how many Senators do you think were less likely to vote for President Trump’s position… whatever Trump’s position was on an issue? How many of the 120 Senators that cast votes during Trump’s Presidency do you think were less likely to vote in line with Trump’s position in the Senate. In other words, if you were going to hold out Donald Trump’s position on the issues as the barometer of say a ‘conservative’ position (or whatever you want to call it), where did Harris stand?

Of those 120 Senators, there are only SIX senators LESS likely to vote with Trump’s position. And when you hear the comparison to Bernie Sanders, the Trump campaign has gone out and said there are services that have said Harris’s voting record is the most liberal, more liberal than Bernie Sanders. Again, the case could be made that’s the case.

But just sheerly based on voting records alone, whose voting record does she most commonly line up with? The answer is, Bernie Sanders. They were almost identical.

Now Harris missed a lot of votes. More than Bern. But there was only a zero-point-three percent difference … that’s it… zero-point-three percent difference in the votes between Harris and Sanders during the Trump administration on Trump’s issues.

And here’s another way of taking a look at it. The average Democrat, while Donald Trump was president, voted for his positions 26% of the time — just over a quarter of the time, your average Democrat was going along with him.

Harris…? Was only there sixteen percent of the time.

So now you kind of fast-forward here. As radical left as the Democrat party has become, as radical left as Joe Biden is, she is that much further to the left of both of them. 

Twenty-six to sixteen — another ten percent move to the left against Trump… in line precisely with Bernie Sanders.

She has the voting record of a socialist.

Harris makes the Trojan Horse whose coat-tails she rode look like a moderate by comparison.

The media can lie all day long, but they can’t unring the bell of that voting record.


This timely little tome chronicles the politically incorrect ministry of one of God’s most effective wildmen, John the Baptist, who prepared the way for Christ’s ministry.

The abrasive message of repentance John preached 2000 years ago is still confrontational and offensive today — but it is also life-changing.

In our putrid, worldly culture that has turned away from God, this book is a must-read for every Christian.

Available in paperback for those of you who like the feel of the pages in your hot, little hands, on Kindle to keep it right at your fingertips, and as an epic Audiobook.

By Kate Stephenson
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x