A federal judge has blocked a major move by President Donald Trump aimed at cutting off government support for two of the nation’s most prominent public broadcasters, delivering a constitutional rebuke that could shape the limits of executive authority over federally funded media.
In a decision issued Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that the administration cannot enforce an executive order directing agencies to halt funding to National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).
The court found the directive unconstitutional and issued an injunction preventing federal officials from carrying it out.
The networks had sued the administration, arguing that the order violated their constitutional protections.
Moss agreed, concluding that the directive ran afoul of the First Amendment by using government power to penalize media organizations over their editorial positions.
According to The Hill, he wrote that “the First Amendment does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type,” emphasizing that the government cannot restrict access to public benefits as a means of influencing or punishing protected expression.
The judge also found that the order failed to apply neutral standards, instead singling out specific organizations over their coverage.
By doing so, he said, the administration crossed a constitutional boundary barring the government from targeting speakers for unfavorable treatment.
Resist the Mainstream reported that Trump signed the executive order in May following years of criticism directed at both NPR and PBS.
He has repeatedly accused the outlets of biased reporting against him and his political allies.
The order instructed the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to halt distributing federal funds as part of a broader effort to reshape public media funding.
However, the broader funding landscape had already shifted.
According to Politico, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was dissolved after Congress approved rescissions that eliminated key funding streams, limiting the immediate impact of the ruling.
Moss acknowledged that reality, noting that while the executive order cannot be enforced, the ruling may carry more legal significance than immediate financial effects.
The White House pushed back quickly.
Spokeswoman Abigail Jackson called the decision “ridiculous” and indicated the administration is considering an appeal.
“NPR and PBS have no right to receive taxpayer funds, and Congress already voted to defund them. The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue,” Jackson said.
Attorneys representing the broadcasters welcomed the decision as a clear affirmation of constitutional protections.
Theodore Boutrous said the ruling reinforces long-established limits on how the government can use funding decisions to influence speech.
Leaders at both organizations also praised the outcome.
NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher called the ruling “a decisive affirmation of the rights of a free and independent press,” while PBS officials said it underscores that editorial decisions cannot be targeted through government action.
Even with the legal victory, public media outlets continue to face financial pressure.
Smaller stations, particularly in rural areas, have been forced to scale back operations, lay off staff, or shut down entirely.
According to USA Today, many have turned to fundraising campaigns to remain operational.
The ruling comes amid broader tensions between the Trump administration and major media organizations, including disputes over press access and regulatory authority.
With the administration signaling a possible appeal, the legal fight over the boundaries of government power and press freedom is just beginning.
WATCH:
