Two Texas Christian street preachers affiliated with the ministry “Testimonies of God” were temporarily detained by Dallas police on Thursday outside the American Airlines Center, sparking a nationwide conversation about free speech and religious expression in public spaces.
The incident occurred as fans arrived for the Dallas Mavericks game against the Detroit Pistons.
Video footage shows the men preaching messages of salvation on a public sidewalk. Officers approached them and instructed the preachers to step back, citing interference with public duties.
Both men were subsequently handcuffed and seated on the curb while questioning the reason for their detention.
According to statements from the ministry, the preachers continued their evangelism despite the arrests.
“The Word of God was not hindered. Many souls heard. Many great Gospel conversations had, Bibles were given, and Christ was exalted,” the organization said in a social media post following the incident.
Conservatives and Christians quickly criticized the arrests on social media as an overreach by law enforcement.
David J. Harris Jr., host of Newsmax’s “The Pulse,” labeled the action “a power trip,” asserting that free speech must apply to all Americans to remain meaningful.
Conservative commentator Gunther Eagleman tweeted at Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), questioning whether the arrests were appropriate.
The Christian Emergency Alliance also emphasized that evangelism receives full First Amendment protection.
State Rep. Brian Harrison (R) said he would be “demanding answers from Dallas PD” regarding the arrests, emphasizing that the First Amendment must be upheld in Texas.
He tagged Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Harmeet K. Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, in his social media post.
Following the fallout, the Dallas Police Department responded on social media, stating the preachers were “temporarily detained for officer safety” and noted a noise ordinance was part of the consideration.
The department said that the preachers were given a citation and stressed that the arrests occurred on private property but reiterated its commitment to safeguarding constitutional rights while enforcing local laws.
This case underscores the tension between constitutional protections and law enforcement discretion, especially during high-traffic events.
Supporters argue the police response was excessive and misdirected, particularly given ongoing concerns about violent crime in the downtown area.
Critics of the arrests counter that maintaining order around large venues is a legitimate safety concern, highlighting the delicate balance between personal freedoms and public security.
Legal analysts note that while public sidewalks generally provide a venue for free speech, circumstances such as crowd control and potential safety risks can justify temporary restrictions.
Observers emphasize the importance of establishing clear guidelines for demonstrations in urban environments to prevent conflicts between citizens’ rights and law enforcement responsibilities.
The preachers’ detention remains under review, and it is unclear whether any charges will be filed.
Regardless of the outcome, the incident has reignited debate over religious expression in public spaces and the scope of police authority.
Many see it as a cautionary tale for cities navigating the intersection of constitutional freedoms, public safety and municipal regulations.
By highlighting the arrest, the ministry and commentators have drawn attention to broader societal issues: the protection of free speech, the role of faith in public life and the responsibility of law enforcement to enforce laws without infringing on constitutional rights.
WATCH:
