House Democrats are facing a firestorm after unveiling plans for a so-called “master ICE tracker,” a controversial initiative that would publicly map Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity using community-submitted reports.
The proposal, spearheaded by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) and backed by Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D), aims to consolidate verified information on ICE enforcement actions into a single Oversight Committee website.
Critics argue the plan jeopardizes federal agents by exposing their locations and movements, a risk law enforcement groups have deemed reckless and politically motivated.
Garcia announced the project at a Los Angeles press event, stating the goal is to “track every single instance that we can verify that the community will send.”
He advised residents to record activity only when safe, emphasizing that reports should be shared with local organizations, elected officials and the Oversight Committee.
The announcement sparked immediate backlash from federal authorities.
The Post Millennial reports that the Department of Homeland Security warned that publicly disclosing ICE activity “directly endangers the lives of ICE law enforcement officers and their families.”
Officials pointed to a recent Dallas shooting, in which a gunman reportedly used a private ICE tracking app to plan an attack on a federal facility, as previously reported by Resist the Mainstream.
Attorney General Pam Bondi condemned the plan.
“Shutdown Democrats are already refusing to pay our law enforcement agents,” she said, according to BizPac Review. “Now, Rep. Robert Garcia and Sen. Richard Blumenthal are trying to put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs.”
“The DOJ has ZERO tolerance for violence against law enforcement—we will prosecute any person who physically assaults our agents.”
The controversy follows Apple’s removal of the ICEBlock app from its store at the Justice Department’s request.
ICEBlock, which allowed real-time tracking of agents, was reportedly used by the Dallas shooter.
Recently, Facebook also dismantled a Chicago-based group devoted to monitoring ICE operations over similar safety concerns.
Garcia defended the tracker, calling it a tool for transparency and civic awareness.
Responding to Bondi on social media, he argued, “ICE detaining over 170 U.S. citizens is not them ‘just doing their jobs.’”
He also accused the attorney general of shielding misconduct while demanding the release of Epstein-related files.
Republicans and law enforcement unions criticized Garcia’s remarks, warning that the tracker could expose officers’ identities and compromise ongoing investigations.
Reports indicate ICE personnel have faced a roughly 1,000 percent rise in workplace violence in recent years, heightening concerns about publicizing operational data.
The debate highlights the widening rift between congressional Democrats and federal law enforcement amid record illegal crossings and political tensions.
Advocates for the tracker frame it as community accountability, while opponents argue it undermines officer safety and national security.
With the Oversight Committee site expected to launch soon, the initiative has already sparked a nationwide conversation about privacy, security and the limits of activism against immigration enforcement.
Its implementation could carry real-world consequences for federal officers on the front lines and set a precedent for how communities interact with law enforcement data moving forward.
WATCH:
