Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) is facing heightened scrutiny as the state navigates a federal challenge over its policy allowing trans-identifying students to compete in school sports according to their so-called gender identity.
The U.S. Department of Education has determined that Minnesota’s rules violate federal Title IX guidelines and set a Friday deadline for compliance, warning that failure to act could jeopardize federal education funding.
Ellison defended the policy, arguing that it ensures fairness and inclusion for all students.
“Participation by transgender athletes doesn’t harm anyone, and excluding them would violate the Minnesota Human Rights Act,” he said.
He emphasized the broader benefits of school athletics, noting that sports help students develop confidence, teamwork and social connections.
“I’m committed to safeguarding students’ rights while resisting harmful federal overreach,” Ellison told local media.
Critics contend that allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports undermines fair competition.
The issue drew national attention after trans-identifying pitcher Marissa Rothenberger led Champlin Park High School to the 2025 girls’ state softball championship, according to the Washington Times.
In response, three anonymous female athletes filed a lawsuit against the state.
The U.S. Department of Education has proposed a resolution requiring Minnesota to adopt sex-based definitions for sports participation and to restore titles awarded to girls’ teams affected by trans-identifying competitors.
A coalition of more than 160 school board members sent an open letter urging Ellison, Minnesota Education Commissioner Willie Jett and the Minnesota State High School League to comply with federal guidance.
The letter warned that failing to act “denies female students equal opportunities and compromises their privacy, safety, and dignity” while placing state education funding at risk, Fox 9 reports.
Ellison acknowledged the potential funding consequences but maintained that the issue is a legal dispute currently before the courts.
Earlier this year, he filed a lawsuit challenging Trump-era executive orders that sought to bar trans-identifying athletes from girls’ sports, contending that the federal directives conflict with both state law and constitutional protections.
Recently, a federal judge denied an emergency injunction requested by Female Athletes United, the advocacy group representing the three softball players, allowing Minnesota’s policy to remain in effect.
The organization has since appealed to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that its members could face irreparable harm in upcoming athletic seasons.
The dispute highlights the growing tension between state authority and federal oversight in education, as Minnesota officials balance compliance with Washington’s mandates against fairness in women’s sports and the rights of both trans-identifying and female athletes.
The issue mirrors a broader national battle over biological males competing in female divisions—one of the most divisive cultural flashpoints in America.
Supporters insist trans-identifying students deserve inclusion under Title IX, while critics counter that biological advantages in strength and endurance threaten the integrity of competition.
More than a dozen states, including Texas, Idaho and Florida, have enacted laws restricting athletic participation to biological sex, setting the stage for an escalating legal showdown between state and federal governments.
For Ellison, the controversy marks part of a broader push to defend “trans” inclusion in school sports.
As opponents call for clear, sex-based participation rules, Minnesota now stands at the epicenter of a national debate over fairness, safety and the proper reach of government in public education.
