Veteran Fox News host Howard Kurtz drew immediate attention during the final broadcast of his Sunday show, “MediaBuzz,” after describing conservative activist Charlie Kirk as “not a saint.”
The comment sparked criticism both from online viewers and colleagues within the network.
Kurtz, who has hosted “MediaBuzz” for over a decade, often sparked debate with his assessments of political figures, making his final remarks on Kirk particularly scrutinized.
The discussion unfolded during a panel featuring Washington Examiner editor Sarah Bedford, who highlighted concerns about political violence, particularly from left-wing extremists.
Bedford acknowledged that threats can emerge from across the political spectrum but stressed that leftist violence is disproportionately concerning.
“An honest conversation about what led to this moment has to focus in part on the left,” she said.
Kurtz responded by emphasizing the “both sides” aspect of Bedford’s remarks.
“I’m glad you mentioned that it’s not unique to one side or one party. Charlie, Charlie Kirk was not a saint,” he said, referencing a statement Kirk made two years ago about the societal cost of gun deaths and the importance of preserving Second Amendment rights.
Kirk’s remarks have often been misrepresented online.
In 2023, he clarified that his statement was about the broader purpose of the Second Amendment: protecting citizens against government overreach.
“The Second Amendment is not about hunting or even personal defense—it’s there to defend against a tyrannical government. Governments tend to become tyrannical, so citizens need the ability to protect themselves,” Kirk said, according to Trending Politics.
He acknowledged that an armed citizenry carries inherent risks, such as gun fatalities, but argued that these are outweighed by the need to protect constitutional rights.
Kirk also proposed safety measures to counter mass shootings, including armed personnel in schools and other vulnerable locations.
Online misinterpretations have repeatedly stripped Kirk’s words of nuance, framing them as callous or extreme.
This pattern highlights the challenge commentators face when discussing politically sensitive issues in today’s polarized media environment.
After the broadcast, Fox News announced that “MediaBuzz” would be canceled.
Kurtz will continue with the network as a political analyst, while White House correspondents Peter Doocy and Jacqui Heinrich are set to host a new Sunday program.
Other network personalities weighed in quickly. Greg Gutfeld shared a viewer tweet celebrating the cancellation.
“I could not be happier this pathetic, weak little man’s show got canceled,” he said.
“[M]aybe we can tune in next week for a clarification….oh wait…,” he added sarcastically, reflecting internal disagreement over Kurtz’s comments about Kirk.
Other conservatives on social media also criticized Kurtz’s comments.
“No wonder they canceled this trash,” X account Salty Texan wrote, adding that Kurtz is “garbage.”
“This is disgusting,” wrote conservative influencer Paul A. Szypula.
The controversy underscores the responsibilities of media figures to provide context and accurate framing when discussing public statements.
Quotes from political figures can be easily misrepresented, sometimes exploited online to justify extreme reactions.
Kirk’s explanations of balancing constitutional rights and public safety have repeatedly been overshadowed by selective interpretation.
As Fox News restructures its Sunday programming, the debate surrounding Kurtz’s critique and the cancellation of “MediaBuzz” highlights the broader challenges of responsible commentary, the portrayal of conservative voices and the scrutiny faced by media figures navigating politically charged narratives.
WATCH:
